API and KOGAS Sign MOU to Co-Write Global Hydrogen Standards

Two organisations that between them help govern how global energy infrastructure gets designed and how one of Asia’s largest gas systems actually runs have just committed to writing the technical rulebook for hydrogen together. The details of what that involves have barely surfaced in English-language coverage.

The American Petroleum Institute (API) and Korea Gas Corporation (KOGAS) signed a memorandum of understanding, announced on 4 September 2026, formalising a joint agenda on standards for hydrogen, low-carbon energy and natural gas.

The timing is not incidental. KOGAS operates South Korea’s national gas grid while pursuing one of East Asia’s most ambitious hydrogen build-outs, and API maintains a portfolio of more than 800 standards that underpin LNG terminals, pipelines and emerging hydrogen assets across several continents.

When those two institutions align on technical standards, it shapes how cross-border infrastructure gets designed, certified and financed. Here is what the agreement actually commits each side to, why standards alignment between North American and East Asian energy bodies matters for infrastructure investment, and what KOGAS’s wider strategy tells you about the deal’s real scope.

What API and KOGAS actually agreed to on 4 September

The MOU was signed in Daegu, South Korea, by Oh Kwon-taek, Head of KOGAS’s Hydrogen New Business Division, and Anshal Rida, API Senior Vice President of Global Industry Services. It sets out a structured framework for expanded cooperation across four areas.

The most concrete piece is already in motion. Eleven technical specialists from KOGAS have been placed on API standards committees, backed by a dedicated internal organisational structure that KOGAS put in place to sustain that engagement.

That matters because standards committees are where the technical rules get written. Placing 11 specialists on them means KOGAS’s operational experience feeds directly into the bodies that decide how global LNG and hydrogen infrastructure should be built, not from the sidelines but from inside the process.

The four workstreams run as follows:

• Standards development: KOGAS expands its role on API committees and joint technical projects, with the stated aim of co-developing and revising global standards for hydrogen, low-carbon energy and natural gas.
• Certification programs: future cooperation to align KOGAS facilities and operations with API certification and quality-management schemes.
• Workforce development: training and capacity-building using API materials and programmes.
• Knowledge sharing: technical exchanges through joint forums, workshops and structured dialogue.

The sequence moves from what already exists toward what is still to come. The certification and co-development elements are forward commitments; the 11 nominated specialists are operational today.

“The partnership aims to enhance safety and technical competitiveness across the hydrogen industry by reflecting KOGAS’s practical operational experience in international standard-setting,” KOGAS said in framing the agreement.

For API, the arrangement widens the global use of its standards and brings more international experts into the process that maintains them. For readers trying to gauge whether this is substance or ceremony, the workstream detail is the answer: one deliverable is live, the rest are scaffolded around it.

Why standards alignment between North America and East Asia matters for LNG and hydrogen investment

Cross-border energy infrastructure faces a practical hurdle before a single tonne of gas moves. It has to be certified against a framework that regulators, financiers and trading partners all recognise, and that recognition is what standards bodies exist to provide.

LNG terminals, hydrogen pipelines and storage assets built to widely recognised specifications integrate far more easily with overseas projects and shipping systems. Regulators in importing countries routinely reference API, ISO or IEC standards when approving receiving terminals, pipelines, storage tanks and hydrogen refuelling stations.

That recognition has a direct commercial edge. Lenders and investors tend to favour projects aligned with internationally recognised standards because it lowers the perceived technical and operational risk, which matters enormously for capital-intensive liquefaction, regasification and hydrogen production assets.

KOGAS is building exactly the kind of infrastructure where this applies. Its 2030 targets sit against a modest current footprint.

Hydrogen storage economics are directly relevant to KOGAS’s 2030 target of four liquefied hydrogen bases using LNG cold energy, since the commercial case for those facilities depends on whether the cost of liquefaction, storage and distribution can be compressed to levels that compete with pipeline gas.

KOGAS’s cross-border relationships with PETRONAS, Woodside and Siemens Energy all depend on technical interoperability. A shared standards framework is what lets those value chains function across jurisdictions rather than stopping at each border.

For anyone tracking hydrogen or LNG investment in the Asia-Pacific, the read is straightforward. Facilities designed and certified under an API-aligned framework are more likely to satisfy both Korean regulators and international project-finance lenders, which cuts approval friction and can shorten project timelines.

Where the limits of standards alignment sit

The alignment is partial, not total. Korean regulators selectively incorporate API practices rather than adopting them wholesale, and domestic hydrogen safety codes already reference specific API documents such as API RP 941 for piping requirements while retaining their own overlay.

That produces a genuine caveat: API-aligned certification may not fully satisfy Korean regulatory requirements on its own, which can leave operators managing dual compliance regimes.

Hydrogen adds a second layer of uncertainty. Many large-scale hydrogen technologies remain in demonstration phases, so the standards governing them are revised frequently, and version-mismatch risks emerge when countries adopt updates at different speeds.

This is a calibration point rather than a knock on the agreement. The MOU produces alignment, not uniformity, and that distinction matters when you assess how much friction it actually removes.

KOGAS’s broader partnership strategy and where the API MOU fits

The API agreement is not a one-off. It slots into a pattern of structured international deals KOGAS has been assembling for several years across LNG supply, hydrogen technology and now standards.

KOGAS’s key international partnerships each cover a different piece of the value chain:

• PETRONAS (June 2025): an MOU spanning the LNG value chain, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen and renewables, with a working-level consultative body established.
• Woodside (2022): a non-binding agreement to investigate a green hydrogen pilot across production, storage, transport and distribution.
• Siemens Energy: cooperation on green hydrogen production, hydrogen turbine power generation and overseas transport strategies.
• API (2026): the standards and certification layer that ties the technical rules together.

Viewed as a stack, the picture is of an institution building the entire hydrogen and LNG value chain in parallel. Supply, technology and transport were already covered; the API MOU adds the standards architecture that makes those pieces operationally coherent rather than just commercially connected.

Energy security investment patterns in 2026 show that capital allocation toward LNG and hydrogen is being driven as much by supply-chain anxiety as by commercial returns, which gives institutions like KOGAS a mandate that goes beyond typical state utility economics.

The agreement also fits a pattern on API’s side. The institute has used bilateral MOUs systematically to extend its standards reach across regions:

• FIPI, India (February 2024): knowledge sharing, joint events and introducing Indian stakeholders to API standards.
• IBP, Brazil (May 2024): collaboration on standards, joint forums and training programmes.
• AMEXHI and IOGP, Mexico (renewed December 2022): joint forums and technical workshops on offshore safety, environmental performance and emergency response.

Against that backdrop, the API-KOGAS deal is the most clearly documented Asia-focused standards MOU in API’s 2024-2026 programme. It links API’s standards architecture with KOGAS’s operational experience running LNG and hydrogen infrastructure at scale, which is what makes it more than a routine cooperation notice.

For readers weighing whether this is a substantive step in Korea’s energy transition or a standalone press release, the surrounding architecture points firmly toward the former.

What this signals for global energy standards and the road ahead

The value of this MOU will be decided over the next two to four years, not at the signing table. A handful of concrete indicators will show whether it produces real alignment or stays on paper.

Watch these signals in particular:

1. The participation records of the 11 KOGAS specialists on API committees, since attendance and contribution reveal whether the seats are being used.
2. Any jointly revised or co-developed standards published by both bodies.
3. API certification uptake at KOGAS facilities.
4. Formation of a working-level consultative body, the kind of structure that appears in the PETRONAS-KOGAS and AMEXHI-IOGP agreements.

Hydrogen is the workstream that matters most. Hydrogen technology standards are still being written across multiple jurisdictions, and early participation in that process shapes the rules for an entire generation of infrastructure.

The commercial stakes sharpen the point. KOGAS is targeting 100 MW-class water electrolysis technology by 2030 and a hydrogen supply price of KRW 6,000/kg by the same year, and the standards governing electrolysis are still being drafted. Getting those rules right is not an abstract exercise; it feeds directly into whether those cost targets are reachable.

The hydrogen market economics that make KOGAS’s KRW 6,000/kg supply price target meaningful are still being shaped by capital costs for electrolysis, renewable electricity pricing and the pace at which offtake agreements create bankable demand, all of which are in flux across the Asia-Pacific region.

There is a structural risk worth flagging. Without strong working-level implementation mechanisms, like the consultative bodies that anchor the PETRONAS and AMEXHI arrangements, a bilateral MOU can drift into a statement of intent rather than a living technical collaboration.

For investors and developers tracking Asia-Pacific hydrogen, the test is whether KOGAS’s specialists can actually move API hydrogen standards in directions that reflect East Asian infrastructure realities. That process will take years to play out.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions. Forward-looking statements and targets are subject to change based on market conditions and various risk factors.

A standards framework built for the long game

The real significance here sits at the level of institutional infrastructure. Before hydrogen and LNG projects can be financed, built and operated across borders, the technical rules governing them have to be recognised by multiple parties, and agreements like this are how that recognition gets constructed.

It is worth being clear about the stage. An MOU is a beginning, not an outcome, and 11 specialists on API committees are the starting point of a long standards development process rather than a finished result.

What the agreement ultimately links is the two ends of a value chain: KOGAS’s 2040 vision of importing roughly 1.21 million tonnes of green hydrogen, and API’s portfolio of more than 800 standards that will help govern how that hydrogen is stored, moved and used.

The distance between those two points is considerable. But this MOU marks the start of a process by which East Asian operational experience gets embedded into the global standards that will shape hydrogen infrastructure for decades.

For readers wanting to understand how the hydrogen supply landscape may shift over the coming decade, our full explainer on natural hydrogen exploration covers the geological basis for low-cost geological hydrogen and what it could mean for electrolysis-based supply chains like those KOGAS is building.

—