Furlan to Add Mobile Crushing Rentals for Mining Operators in 2027

Furlan Equipamentos, a Brazilian manufacturer whose rental fleet has until recently served almost entirely quarry and aggregates clients, has announced that it will add mobile crushing sets to its rental portfolio by 2027. The reveal came at Exposibram 2026 in Belo Horizonte, and it signals a deliberate pivot toward mining operators running fixed-term projects.

The timing matters. The case for renting rather than buying mobile crushing equipment is genuinely strengthening across Latin America, where commercial equipment loans commonly carry 12-15% annual interest and many mining projects have defined, short-horizon production windows. The global mining equipment rental market is tracking mid-single-digit growth, and Brazil already has a structured rental segment that recognises crushing and screening as a core equipment category.

If you are a mining operator weighing whether to rent or buy for an upcoming fixed-term project, this announcement is worth your attention. This piece covers the structure of Furlan’s offering, the conditions under which renting mobile crushing equipment makes operational sense, and the real trade-offs that belong in your evaluation before you commit.

How Furlan’s rental model is structured, and what it includes

Furlan’s rental business is not a standing start. The company launched the service experimentally in 2025 and now holds around 80 units designated for rental, with roughly half already deployed under active contracts and between 30 and 40 units available for new agreements. That fleet has been concentrated in quarries and aggregate operations, mainly within São Paulo state.

The mobile crushing addition is deliberately modest at launch: two to three sets initially, scalable on demand, targeting a 2027 rollout. Furlan revealed the plan at Exposibram 2026, held at Expominas BH in Belo Horizonte from 24-27 August 2026, exhibiting at booth J05.

What separates this from a bare-hire arrangement is what sits inside the package. Furlan presented an integrated offer for mining that bundles four components together:

• Furlan-manufactured equipment built in-house
• OEM engineering support from the company’s technical teams
• Unit-level operational history for each machine
• Genuine spare-parts supply integrated with the equipment

That integration matters because it removes a core risk of renting heavy process equipment. You get not just the machine but its documented operational history, genuine parts, and direct engineering support, which meaningfully lowers the probability of unplanned downtime compared with sourcing a crusher from a third-party hire company that knows nothing about the unit’s past.

Furlan designed the rental for three specific use cases: temporary capacity expansions, coverage of scheduled shutdowns, and replacement of equipment undergoing refurbishment. Note what is absent from that list. This is not framed as a solution for continuous, high-throughput production.

Gustavo Furlan, Commercial Manager, Furlan Equipamentos The higher added value of mobile crushing units is expected to attract mining companies as new clients, shifting the rental client profile from aggregate producers toward mining operators.

The distinction between bare hire and an OEM-backed integrated solution has direct implications for your project risk and cost certainty. When you rent from the manufacturer, the service standards travel with the machine.

What makes mobile crushing sets operationally right for temporary mining projects

Start with the physical design, because the economics follow from it. Mobile crushing units can be assembled on tracked or wheeled chassis, consolidating multiple crushing stages into a single structure. That configuration simplifies relocation, setup, and removal at temporary mine sites.

Mobility here is not a convenience feature. It is the structural reason the rental model works for fixed-term mining: the equipment comes in, does the work, and leaves, with no permanent installation cost and no stranded-asset problem when the campaign ends.

The broader adoption trajectory for mobile crushing plants across Latin America reflects a region still calibrating between the flexibility advantages of wheeled and tracked configurations and the throughput certainty that permanent fixed-plant installations provide.

Layer the financing context on top. At 12-15% annual interest on commercial equipment loans in Brazil, renting converts a large capital commitment into predictable operating expenditure, which changes the project-level business case entirely. For a 12-18 month satellite pit or trial campaign, you avoid both the upfront outlay and the eventual disposal or relocation headache of permanent plant.

Brazil’s business credit interest rate data published by TheGlobalEconomy.com, drawing on Central Bank of Brazil figures, shows the rate at 20.8% in June 2026 against a long-run average of 17.71%, confirming that the financing cost environment weighting operators toward rental is structural rather than a temporary anomaly.

Monthly rental rates in Latin American industrial hubs run approximately USD 14,000-28,000 for a standard mobile unit, according to a cost-effectiveness analysis published in August 2026, typically with routine preventive maintenance and wear parts included in the fee. The financial logic above is what makes that rate viable even though it looks high in absolute terms.

There is a documented precedent for how this plays out in Brazilian mining. A Metso case study describes wheel-mounted and track-mounted mobile crushing units deployed at Vale’s Salobo copper mine under a Life Cycle Services agreement, with Metso supplying and maintaining the equipment against performance targets.

Vale Salobo mine, Metso Life Cycle Services The rental-plus-service model reportedly delivered over 50% improvement in tyre life for large mine trucks, alongside spare-tyre savings and reduced maintenance downtime, by producing the correct grade of gravel on site.

The broader market confirms this is an established, if still-maturing, category. Grand View Research estimates the global mining equipment rental market at USD 112.15 billion in 2025, forecast to reach USD 144.49 billion by 2030 at a 5.2% CAGR. Brazil’s slice is projected to rise from USD 2,883.2 million in 2024 to USD 3,930.1 million by 2030.

Where does your own project sit? The table below sketches the split.

Trade-offs operators should evaluate before committing to a rental arrangement

Renting is not automatically the cheaper option, and treating it as such is where operators get caught. The honest constraints belong in your calculation before you sign, not after.

Four areas deserve scrutiny:

• Total cost over time: rentals minimise upfront cost, but cumulative fees on high-utilisation, long-duration projects can exceed ownership economics. Run the full project-life comparison of total rental payments versus purchase plus maintenance.
• Availability and specification: rental fleets may not carry the exact crusher configuration your ore type or capacity requires. Reserve early and open a clear specification dialogue with the supplier.
• Mobilisation and demobilisation: moving tracked or wheeled plants to remote sites carries transport and labour costs that can be large relative to short contracts, eroding the rental advantage if volumes are low.
• Contract terms: clauses covering minimum utilisation, wear-and-tear in high-abrasion applications, and termination conditions all need reading before you commit.

Brazil’s mining sector financing landscape extends beyond commercial bank loans, with state-directed credit lines at significantly lower rates creating a parallel calculus that operators should factor into any rent-versus-buy comparison before relying solely on commercial borrowing benchmarks.

On the economics, illustrative ROI modelling flagged in the research reports benefit-cost ratios around 1.8 in favour of rental for short-duration, lower-utilisation projects carrying high financing costs. Treat that as a modelling figure rather than a verified market study, but the direction is consistent with the financing logic.

Why Furlan’s own framing is a useful screen

There is a practical signal in how Furlan describes the product. The company positions the rental for temporary expansions, planned shutdowns, and refurbishment cover, not continuous high-throughput production. That framing is itself a guide to where the economics work.

Context on adoption reinforces the caution. Equipment rental represented approximately 26% of machine sales in Brazil in 2022, but that penetration is heavily driven by construction and infrastructure. Adoption in core mining remains lower than in construction and aggregates, which tells you the mining rental model is still maturing rather than settled.

If you understand these trade-offs upfront, you can structure the contract, reserve equipment early, and build mobilisation into the budget rather than discovering it after commitment. That is the difference between a rental that saves money and one that quietly costs more than buying.

What Furlan’s 2027 timeline means for operators planning now

The timeline is real, but keep it in proportion. The rental service launched experimentally in 2025, mobile crushing sets are targeted for 2027, and the initial fleet is just two to three units, with any scale-up contingent on client demand. This is not a large-scale market shift; it is a small, deliberate entry.

What gives the offering weight is the manufacturer behind it. Furlan provides end-to-end processing plant solutions, from feasibility studies and engineering design through to full delivery, covering crushers, grinding machinery, classification, and screening. Rental clients are therefore accessing a company with full-plant engineering depth, not a third-party hire desk.

The announcement also lands against a busy backdrop. Exposibram 2026 featured more than 750 stands and a floor area roughly 13% larger than the previous edition, according to O Tempo, signalling broad industry engagement at the event where Furlan made the reveal.

Here is the practical implication. With only two to three units at launch and a current core fleet of around 80 already half-deployed, availability will be limited relative to any concentrated demand. If you have a project fit, the relevant action is dialogue with Furlan now, not at the point of mobilisation when constraints will be most acute.

A sensible sequence for operators self-screening against the model:

1. Confirm your project timeline and duration against the sub-24-month window where rental economics tend to hold.
2. Assess whether rental economics outperform financing at current 12-15% interest rates over your project life.
3. Engage Furlan directly on specification and availability well ahead of mobilisation.
4. Review contract terms covering mobilisation, wear-and-tear, and minimum utilisation before signing.

Furlan’s stated rental use cases Temporary capacity expansions, coverage of scheduled shutdowns, and replacement of equipment undergoing refurbishment. If your project does not map to one of these, the total-cost comparison deserves a closer look.

An OEM rental model entering a market that is still deciding whether to adopt it

The core tension runs through the whole story. Mobile crushing rentals are economically compelling for a specific slice of mining projects, the short-horizon, high-financing-cost, flexibility-driven ones, yet penetration in core mining still trails aggregates and construction. Operators are genuinely still forming views on whether rental-based fleets suit mining’s throughput and availability demands.

What Furlan’s Exposibram 2026 announcement represents structurally is an OEM-backed model built to address exactly the risk points that have slowed mining’s adoption of third-party hire for process-critical equipment: unknown unit history, non-genuine parts, and absent engineering support. Whether that reassurance is enough to move the sector is the open question.

OEM-backed service models are reshaping how mining operators budget for equipment availability, with predictive maintenance data and remote diagnostics increasingly bundled into supply agreements rather than treated as separate procurement decisions.

Three variables will determine whether the 2027 launch translates into broader adoption: client uptake of those initial two to three units, whether OEM-backed integration genuinely lowers the perceived risk of renting for mining clients, and whether Brazil’s elevated financing-cost environment persists to keep tilting the rent-versus-buy calculation toward hire.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Financial projections are subject to market conditions and various risk factors. Forward-looking statements are speculative and subject to change based on market developments and company performance.